Imagine investing $250,000 in a real estate deal. The promised payments stop, explanations change, and the promoter eventually pleads guilty to fraud. For an investor, that development brings an immediate question: how much of my money will I recover?
That question is timely following Cesar Pina’s October 22, 2026, guilty plea in federal court in New Jersey. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the real estate promoter known as “Flipping NJ” solicited investments with promises of returns of 30% or more within four to five months, then misappropriated investors’ funds. Sentencing is scheduled for March 10, 2027.
The charging document describes contracts tied to specific properties and undisclosed mortgages and investments from other investors. Those details illustrate why recovery requires examining the underlying transactions: what was promised, who received the money, and what assets may be available.
Criminal restitution can provide a route to repayment, but an order does not guarantee collection. The Justice Department explains that defendants may lack sufficient assets, owe many victims, and make only partial payments over time. Investors should document their losses and follow instructions from the prosecutor’s victim-witness personnel or the probation office.
Civil options deserve a separate assessment. The Justice Department recognizes that some fraud victims may pursue civil claims and cautions that filing deadlines apply. Investors should ask counsel to evaluate those deadlines while the criminal case proceeds. The assessment should also address available assets, litigation costs, and the evidence supporting a claim against each proposed defendant.
For that review, assemble the signed agreements, wire confirmations, bank records, emails, texts, and investment materials. Prepare a chronology showing each payment, each repayment, and each explanation for the delay. Identify the exact entities involved and any property addresses. Separate principal invested, money already returned and promised profits so counsel can assess the claimed loss.
An existing restitution order may also offer enforcement options. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3664(m)(1)(B), a victim named in the order can obtain an abstract of judgment and, after satisfying applicable state recording requirements, establish a lien against the defendant’s property in that state. Counsel should evaluate whether that process would help collect the debt.
Recovery efforts should be coordinated. Section 3664(j)(2) addresses adjustments for compensatory damages later recovered through civil proceedings for the same loss, including the applicable state-law qualification. Keep an accurate record of payments from every source.
If you would like to learn more about our Business Litigation group, click here.